<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cordsnipped</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cordsnipped.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cordsnipped.com</link>
	<description>consuming content in the new living room</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='cordsnipped.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://cordsnipped.com/osd.xml" title="cordsnipped" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cordsnipped.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Hulu Redesigns Apple TV App &#8216;From The Ground Up&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/hulu-redesigns-apple-tv-app-from-the-ground-up/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/hulu-redesigns-apple-tv-app-from-the-ground-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the great content on Netflix and iTunes, I still haven&#8217;t paid for a Hulu subscription yet. Hulu Redesigns Apple TV App &#8216;From The Ground Up&#8217;.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=204&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the great content on Netflix and iTunes, I still haven&#8217;t paid for a Hulu subscription yet.</p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/apps/2013/03/19/hulu-redesigns-app-for-apple-tv-with-new-content-categories-shows-you-watch-tray-and-easier-playback/?utm_medium=Spreadus&amp;utm_campaign=social%20media&amp;awesm=tnw.to_g0cnl&amp;utm_source=Twitter">Hulu Redesigns Apple TV App &#8216;From The Ground Up&#8217;</a>.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=204&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/hulu-redesigns-apple-tv-app-from-the-ground-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC Works on an App for Live Streaming Shows to Mobile Devices &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/abc-works-on-an-app-for-live-streaming-shows-to-mobile-devices-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/abc-works-on-an-app-for-live-streaming-shows-to-mobile-devices-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney has always been ahead of the curve on this stuff &#8211; with its Watch ABC and Watch ESPN apps &#8211; but streaming network broadcasts live would be something. The problem, of course, is that there are so many complexities and hands in the pot &#8211; show producers, cable providers, affiliates &#8211; that the transition [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=203&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disney has always been ahead of the curve on this stuff &#8211; with its Watch ABC and Watch ESPN apps &#8211; but streaming network broadcasts live would be something. The problem, of course, is that there are so many complexities and hands in the pot &#8211; show producers, cable providers, affiliates &#8211; that the transition to cord cutting will not be easy:</p>
<blockquote><p>Disney already distributes similar live streaming and on-demand apps, known as “Watch” apps, for ESPN and the Disney Channel. Special hurdles exist, however, for the ABC app, in part because of contracts between the network and the companies that produce some of its shows that were written before mobile phone video streaming was even possible. Other complexities involve ABC’s local stations, which might — if not courted properly — feel threatened by an app.</p>
<p>But ABC, seeing shifts in consumer behavior, is pressing forward. It has started to talk with stations about how to include them in the live streaming app. Illustrating the difficult contractual issues, ABC offhandedly first mentioned a forthcoming Watch ABC app in a news release nine months ago, when it signed a deal with Comcast to make several Watch Disney apps available to Comcast subscribers.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/19/business/media/abc-works-on-an-app-for-streaming-shows-to-mobile-devices.html?smid=tw-NYTimesAd&amp;seid=auto&amp;_r=1&amp;">ABC Works on an App for Live Streaming Shows to Mobile Devices &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=203&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/abc-works-on-an-app-for-live-streaming-shows-to-mobile-devices-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Confirms It Will Build A Smart Watch As Speculation About Apple’s iWatch Continues &#124; TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/samsung-confirms-it-will-build-a-smart-watch-as-speculation-about-apples-iwatch-continues-techcrunch/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/samsung-confirms-it-will-build-a-smart-watch-as-speculation-about-apples-iwatch-continues-techcrunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a Casio in, like, 1992. Besides email and a color display, I&#8217;m trying to figure out what these will do differently&#8230; Samsung is indeed working on a smart watch, the company’s Executive Vice President of Mobile told Bloomberg in an interview today. “We are preparing products for the future, and the watch is [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=202&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a Casio in, like, 1992. Besides email and a color display, I&#8217;m trying to figure out what these will do differently&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Samsung is indeed working on a smart watch, the company’s Executive Vice President of Mobile told Bloomberg in an interview today. “We are preparing products for the future, and the watch is definitely one of them,,” Hee told the publication in no uncertain terms, adding that between itself and Apple, the “issue here is who will first commercialize it so consumers can use it meaningfully.”</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/19/samsung-confirms-it-will-build-a-smart-watch-as-speculation-about-apples-iwatch-continues/">Samsung Confirms It Will Build A Smart Watch As Speculation About Apple’s iWatch Continues | TechCrunch</a>.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=202&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/19/samsung-confirms-it-will-build-a-smart-watch-as-speculation-about-apples-iwatch-continues-techcrunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart Homes: Our Next Digital Privacy Nightmare – ReadWrite</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/smart-homes-our-next-digital-privacy-nightmare-readwrite/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/smart-homes-our-next-digital-privacy-nightmare-readwrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Things]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I imagine people said the same thing about photos being used as evidence 200 years ago. Hackers, however, are a major concern. Every time we connect another one of our household appliances to the Internet, we&#8217;re going to be generating another set of data about our lives and storing it some company&#8217;s servers. That data [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=199&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine people said the same thing about photos being used as evidence 200 years ago. Hackers, however, are a major concern.</p>
<blockquote><p>Every time we connect another one of our household appliances to the Internet, we&#8217;re going to be generating another set of data about our lives and storing it some company&#8217;s servers. That data can be incredibly useful to us, but it creates yet another digital trail of personal details that could become vulnerable to court subpoenas, law enforcement requests (with or without a warrant) or hackers.</p>
<p>Okay, so maybe you don&#8217;t care if somebody else knows what&#8217;s in your WiFi-connected refrigerator. But what about your bedroom?</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://readwrite.com/2013/03/18/smart-homes-our-next-digital-privacy-nightmare">Smart Homes: Our Next Digital Privacy Nightmare – ReadWrite</a>.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=199&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/smart-homes-our-next-digital-privacy-nightmare-readwrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon only wants to pay for the TV channels its viewers are watching</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/verizon-only-wants-to-pay-for-the-tv-channels-its-viewers-are-watching/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/verizon-only-wants-to-pay-for-the-tv-channels-its-viewers-are-watching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But will Verizon only charge its customers for the channels they watch? ESPN would be the hardest hit if Verizon (or any cable provider) pulled this off. Verizon only wants to pay for the TV channels its viewers are watching.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=198&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But will Verizon only charge its customers for the channels <em>they</em> watch? ESPN would be the hardest hit if Verizon (or any cable provider) pulled this off.</p>
<p><a href="http://getpocket.com/a/read/318436981">Verizon only wants to pay for the TV channels its viewers are watching</a>.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=198&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/verizon-only-wants-to-pay-for-the-tv-channels-its-viewers-are-watching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Steams Ahead with New Series from Simon Cowell and Reddit</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/youtube-steams-ahead-with-new-series-from-simon-cowell-and-reddit/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/youtube-steams-ahead-with-new-series-from-simon-cowell-and-reddit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The star of one of the biggest TV shows ever&#8230; producing a YouTube series, in partnership with Reddit. Big names, all-around. YouTube Steams Ahead with New Series from Simon Cowell and Reddit.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=197&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The star of one of the biggest TV shows ever&#8230; producing a YouTube series, in partnership with Reddit. Big names, all-around.</p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/google/2013/03/18/new-youtube-series-from-simon-cowell-and-reddit-should-strike-fear-in-the-hearts-of-tv-networks/?awesm=tnw.to_p2M7&amp;utm_medium=Spreadus&amp;utm_source=Twitter&amp;utm_campaign=social%20media">YouTube Steams Ahead with New Series from Simon Cowell and Reddit</a>.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=197&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/03/18/youtube-steams-ahead-with-new-series-from-simon-cowell-and-reddit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC Will Stream All of the Sochi Winter Games Live</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/05/nbc-will-stream-all-of-the-sochi-winter-games-live/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/05/nbc-will-stream-all-of-the-sochi-winter-games-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No surprise here. NBC announced their intent to stream all of the 2014 Winter Olympics live, something they did for the first time in London last summer. We can assume that the live stream will be free, but, as was the case with the London games, you&#8217;ll likely need to flash your cable provider credentials [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=193&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" alt="" src="http://static.tumblr.com/7881cb111ec9125abf966ee311c7b0d9/atlgosh/0kGmgsgal/tumblr_static_sochi-large.png" width="342" height="385" />No surprise here. NBC <a title="https://twitter.com/EricFisherSBJ/status/298839604067446784" href="https://twitter.com/EricFisherSBJ/status/298839604067446784" target="_blank">announced their intent to stream all of the 2014 Winter Olympics live</a>, something they did for the first time in London last summer. We can assume that the live stream will be free, but, as was the case with the London games, you&#8217;ll likely need to flash your cable provider credentials to get access (<a title="http://deadspin.com/5931088/no-one-is-saying-whether-nbcs-olympic-streaming-is-a-success" href="http://deadspin.com/5931088/no-one-is-saying-whether-nbcs-olympic-streaming-is-a-success" target="_blank">which caused problems for some</a>).</p>
<p>NBC claimed that their live streaming of the summer games actually <a title="http://m.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/2012/08/13/Olympics/Lazarus.aspx" href="http://m.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/2012/08/13/Olympics/Lazarus.aspx" target="_blank">helped prime time viewership</a>, which leads me to believe that they considered (are considering?) the stream to be complement to the over-produced TV broadcasts, rather than an alternative.</p>
<p>2014 <em>should </em>be the year NBC treats its online stream as an equal. In August, Michael Humphrey, writing for Forbes, <a title="http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelhumphrey/2012/08/13/nbc-olympics-fans-liked-you-youre-profitable-now-change/" href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelhumphrey/2012/08/13/nbc-olympics-fans-liked-you-youre-profitable-now-change/" target="_blank">made that case</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>But NBC should change, faster. Because maybe in two years, maybe in four, but definitely sometime, there is going to be an American TV Spring — when a great majority of viewers realize they could have more — that will make #NBCfail look like a cocktail party. It’s not just about perception and reputation. It’s about building experiences that get around NBC’s coverage or just simply giving up on the concept. Because, yes, the Olympics are very compelling. But not if we have to watch them through a keyhole. Some will try to blast the door open (Twitter protests), some will break in through a window (pirate streams) but some will just walk away from most of it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some other notes, <a title="https://twitter.com/EricFisherSBJ/status/298839915100258306" href="https://twitter.com/EricFisherSBJ/status/298839915100258306" target="_blank">via Eric Fisher</a>: NBC&#8217;s broadcast will begin on Thursday, February 6, 2014, a night <em>before </em>the opening ceremonies. All US hockey games &#8211; men&#8217;s and women&#8217;s &#8211; will air on TV live.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=193&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/05/nbc-will-stream-all-of-the-sochi-winter-games-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://static.tumblr.com/7881cb111ec9125abf966ee311c7b0d9/atlgosh/0kGmgsgal/tumblr_static_sochi-large.png" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Gets Abbey</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/05/amazon-gets-abbey/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/05/amazon-gets-abbey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Amazon locks down &#8216;Downton Abbey&#8217; exclusively for Prime Instant Video &#124; The Verge. A little feather in Amazon&#8217;s cap: Amazon and Netflix continue to elevate their battle for subscription streaming video supremacy. Just a day after Netflix premiered its original show House of Cards, Amazon has announced that it has struck a deal with PBS to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=183&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/1/3941158/downton-abbey-amazon-prime-instant-video-exclusive"><img src='http://cordsnipped.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/abbyjpg-3addb65431969381_large_verge_medium_landscape.jpeg?w=580' alt='' /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/1/3941158/downton-abbey-amazon-prime-instant-video-exclusive">Amazon locks down &#8216;Downton Abbey&#8217; exclusively for Prime Instant Video | The Verge</a>.</p>
<p>A little feather in Amazon&#8217;s cap:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px;background-color:#ffffff;">Amazon and Netflix continue to elevate their battle for subscription streaming video supremacy. Just a day after Netflix premiered </span><a style="color:#fb4834;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px;background-color:#ffffff;" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/1/3939814/netflix-original-series-house-of-cards-available-now-kevin-spacey">its original show <i>House of Cards</i></a><span style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px;background-color:#ffffff;">, Amazon has announced that it has struck a deal with PBS to exclusively carry the US subscription streaming rights to the incredibly popular show </span><i style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px;background-color:#ffffff;">Downton Abbey</i><span style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px;background-color:#ffffff;">. Season three will be released exclusively on Prime Instant Video on June 18th, and while seasons one and two are currently available on other services, later this year they&#8217;ll only be found on Prime Instant Video. Season four — and season five, if produced — will also be exclusive as part of the agreement. The show will still be available on DVD and from non-subscription services like iTunes.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Not sure <em>Downton Abbey </em>is <em>the</em> show to target for exclusive rights, since we can safely assume that its viewing audience skews a bit older and probably won&#8217;t be cutting cords anytime soon&#8230; but, it&#8217;s a nice win for Amazon. They recently <a title="Time Warner and Netflix are at it Again" href="http://cordsnipped.com/2013/01/15/time-warner-and-netflix-bump-ug/">lost their exclusive rights to the </a><em><a title="Time Warner and Netflix are at it Again" href="http://cordsnipped.com/2013/01/15/time-warner-and-netflix-bump-ug/">West Wing</a> </em>(just days after I dropped $80 on a Prime membership so I could watch Aaron Sorkin&#8217;s zaniness at work&#8230; ). Replacing it with another smart, critically acclaimed show won&#8217;t hurt.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=183&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/05/amazon-gets-abbey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://cordsnipped.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/abbyjpg-3addb65431969381_large_verge_medium_landscape.jpeg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix Wants to Dump Hundreds of Millions of Dollars More into Original Content</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/01/netflix-wants-to-dump-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-more-into-original-content/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/01/netflix-wants-to-dump-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-more-into-original-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Cheredar, writing for VentureBeat: So, Netflix’s decision to ask investors to pony up more money for (among other things) new original content –  days before the release of its first big series premiere, House of Cards — definitely qualifies as one of those decisions. (I say this because there’s a possibility that people won’t like the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=173&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="http://venturebeat.com/2013/01/29/netflix-400-million-new-content/" href="http://venturebeat.com/2013/01/29/netflix-400-million-new-content/" target="_blank">Tom Cheredar, writing for VentureBeat</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>So, Netflix’s decision to ask investors to pony up more money for (among other things) new original content –  days before the release of its first big series premiere, <em>House of Cards</em> — definitely qualifies as one of those decisions. (I say this because there’s a possibility that people won’t like the show. Sure, early reviewers had glowing things to say about it, but they don’t always speak for the general viewing audience.)</p>
<p>In a letter to investors today, Hastings asked investors to finance <a href="http://ir.netflix.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=736091" target="_blank">$400 million</a> (PDF), which the company intends to use for refinance existing notes ($225 million) and other “general corporate purposes.” But, <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2013/01/29/netflix-400-million-new-content/allthingsd.com/20130129/netflix-raises-more-money-for-originals-like-house-of-cards/" target="_blank">AllThingsD</a>‘s Peter Kafka points out that the vague-ish “purposes” for the remaining amount will go toward producing new original content, according to statements Hastings made in the <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2013/01/23/netflix-spikes-25-in-after-hours-trading-after-adding-2m-new-subscribers/" target="_blank">Q4 2012 letter to shareholders</a> last week.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hastings has made it clear that <a title="Netflix is Gunning for HBO" href="http://cordsnipped.com/2013/01/30/netflix-is-gunning-for-hbo/" target="_blank">this is Netflix&#8217;s future</a>, for better or worse. <em>House of Cards</em>, debuting today, will give us a good indication if the world is ready for it.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=173&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/01/netflix-wants-to-dump-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-more-into-original-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content is Fragmented</title>
		<link>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/01/content-is-fragmented/</link>
		<comments>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/01/content-is-fragmented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cordsnipped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cordsnipped.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[via Danny Sullivan Fragmented to&#8230; very fragmented? Danny Sullivan, writing for CNET, about how difficult &#8211; confusing &#8211; your digital content library is.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=168&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:left;"><a href="http://cordsnipped.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-11-53-31-am.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-170 aligncenter" alt="Screen Shot 2013-02-01 at 11.53.31 AM" src="http://cordsnipped.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-11-53-31-am.png?w=580&#038;h=392" width="580" height="392" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>via Danny Sullivan</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Fragmented to&#8230; <em>very fragmented?</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><a title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-33620_3-57566817-278/how-trapped-are-your-digital-movies-and-tv-shows/?subj=news&amp;tag=title" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-33620_3-57566817-278/how-trapped-are-your-digital-movies-and-tv-shows/?subj=news&amp;tag=title" target="_blank">Danny Sullivan, writing for CNET, about how difficult &#8211; confusing &#8211; your digital content library is</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cordsnipped.com&#038;blog=45375861&#038;post=168&#038;subd=cordsnipped&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cordsnipped.com/2013/02/01/content-is-fragmented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e111f47e1f4a6a713410515593d2b64f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cordsnipped</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://cordsnipped.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-11-53-31-am.png?w=580" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Screen Shot 2013-02-01 at 11.53.31 AM</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
